This New World Order is
anticipated with hope by an elite few operating in the shadows of history and
far from public view. While these insiders have avoided the spotlights, others
have been thrust to the forefront to evangelize the world with its message of
planetary survival and has been heralded by a multitude from among the world's
most esteemed and renowned leaders in every field.
The arguments
calling for its existence are formidable.
Salvation from
Disaster
"John Lennon came up with the consummate creedal statement
and description of what a New World Order would be like in his famous song,
"Imagine." Lennon entreats the world to imagine with him no heaven, no
countries, all people living in peace as one brotherhood of man, with the final
and only option if it is to survive, a world united as one." (Tal Brooke, When The World Will Be As One, pg. 12)
The
word "survival" is never far from the lips of those who wish to impose
state power in order to protect us from disaster, named or
unnamed.
Those who can be convinced that survival is at stake are likely
to agree to almost any remedy, since extinction seems worse than all the
alternatives. If placing extraordinary powers in the hands of political leaders
will truly stave off the ultimate disaster, then those who demur can be made to
appear as enemies of the human race. That is why arguments based on survival
are so effective in persuading people to permit actions that violate their
moral code. [Herbert Schlossberg, Idols For Destruction, pp. 180-181.]
One of the most compelling arguments for a new world order is the danger of global annihilation. The threat of war, especially atomic war, would cause those who have only the values of personal peace and prosperity to be ready for almost any kind of authoritarian government which would be able to remove the threat of war, particularly if (as Augustus did in ancient Rome) it was brought in while seemingly keeping the outward forms of constitutionality. Those who push this argument are at the forefront of global disarmament and a one-world "peace-keeping" military force, namely the United Nations.
- B.F. Skinner says repeatedly that we cannot be saved without turning ourselves over to controllers who will condition us to act in ways that are conducive to survival.
- Heilbroner says that only obedience to the political powers can save us.
- The second Humanist Manifesto declares that we cannot survive without "bold and daring" measures, by which it means collectivist ones.
Save the
Planet
"There is the ecological argument of Greenpeace, The Club of
Rome, and other groups stating that mankind has come of age - that now we must
be planetary stewards of the earth's ecology before the world's ecosystem is
irreversibly damaged from industrial pollution by selfish nations who are
accountable to none but whose irresponsibility directly affects the lives of
other nations." (Tal Brooke, When The World Will Be As One, pg.
9)
People have been becoming increasingly aware that the problems
of external security which are facing their national governments are problems
facing the world today - ozone depletion, air pollution, acid rain, nuclear
accidents, over-population, drought, famine, international terrorism,
international trading, multinational corporation, international communications,
etc. - cannot be controlled or solved by individual national governments. So
men are beginning to look beyond their national governments to a higher
denomination of government - a world government with legislative, enforcement,
and judicial influence on a world scale.
Economic
Security
"There is the economic call for globalism. Virtually every
major name in banking from Rockefeller to Rothschild to Robert McNamara
(president of The World Bank) has spoken of the reality of an interlocking
global economy - that what happens on Wall Street one minute is felt in London
or Tokyo the next, that the complex jigsaw puzzle of world economy is moving
into an oscillating ball that will eventually unify nations and currencies in
the global marketplace, and that the economic forces of the earth are moving
relentlessly toward a unified world system." (Tal Brooke, When
The World Will Be As One, pg. 11.)
There are the social and political voices talking about the unfair
distribution of wealth and resources - that a global system of sharing and
redistribution could remedy the social problems of cross-national envy, and
that if this were addressed, a major component of international strife and war
would be removed forever.
In 2008, the world experienced a global
manipulation of economies by a global elite pushing sovereign governments
toward a global banking system with complete control of their financial
systems. This led America to elect a Marxist inspired president who claimed it
was good to "share the wealth." Once in power, he filled his government with
one world government advocates at every level of his
administration.
The Global Village
"There
is the "global village" argument of Marshall McLuhan - that modern technology
has altered the landscape of the earth, and that what were once great natural
barriers of distance, thought, and language have been collapsed by the myriad
jets and airwaves filling the sky and the Information Superhighway."
(Tal Brooke, When The World Will Be As One, pg.
10.)
To help complacent Americans accept the new government
intrusions, Clinton propagandists instilled fear of just about every crisis
they could conjure up.
The buzzword of the nineties was
"crisis." We were told we had a health care "crisis" - justifying the
government takeover of one-seventh of the U.S. economy. We were told we had a
ecological "crisis" - justifying the government to impose far reaching new
regulations on businesses. We were told we had a child care "crisis" -
justifying the government to extend its reach into the family.
"It takes more than a family to raise children." [Hillary Clinton]
Hillary Clinton said in her speech at the 1996 Democratic
Convention her belief that children should be raised by a "village."
Hillary Clinton argues,
"Children should have a right to be permitted to decide their own future if
they are competent." "Decisions about motherhood and
abortion,
schooling, cosmetic surgery, treatment of venereal disease, or employment, and
others where the decision or lack of one will significantly affect the child's
future should not be made unilatrally by parents."
The Clinton's not
only redefined the
family but they created an Orwellian euphemism for bureaucracy to replace
it.
Hillary Clinton chaired the New World Foundation 1987-88, ranked by
the Capitol Research Center as "one of the ten most liberal foundations in the
United States." From 1986-92 she chaired the Children's Defense Fund (CDF),
which promotes an amoral approach to sex education and other means of
destroying the very moral values which most parents want to pass on to their
children. The CDF agrees with the Clinton's and wants to redefine the family
believing government can serve as surrogate parents (the "village"). That means that kids would no longer be
primarily accountable to their parents. To whom would they be accountable to?
The answer, of course, is the state. The benevolent state. The
"VILLAGE," then, would transcend the Orwellian "Big Brother" role and
become surrogate parent. It would grant your children "rights" and be their
legal guardian.
Authoritarian and totalitarian regimes - be they
fascist or communist in nature - have always sought to
destroy the traditional family unit by severing the bonds between parents and
their children, thereby increasing the power of the government. Quite
simply, Donna Shalala, Hillary Rodham, and other modern statists believe they
can raise your children better than you can. That's what they mean by
"children's rights" - the rights of children to be liberated from the shackles
of their evil parents.
Believing that it takes more than a family to
raise children, Clinton's Big Government, "Village", turned the rhetoric to
focus on Children. In almost every speech, on about any topic, in just about
any context, Bill Clinton used that "powerful" emotion-filled statement,
"for the children."
What they really meant
is for parents to give government more of their income so that big wasteful
government programs can continue. They speak of supporting the family but what
they support is a kinder and gentler way of destroying the traditional family
and raising up a village or commune that is in tune with their
distorted
vision of the new millennium.
Homeland Security
Following a series of events orchestrated to coerce Americans to freely give up their Constitutional Rights...
- On January 24, 2003, President George W. Bush created the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to more effectively control public opinion through fear and intimidation and to control the free movement of American citizens.
- USA PATRIOT Act gives BIG government far-reaching access into the private lives of Americans, including their financial records, Internet surfing habits and email, telephone records, business records, access to public transportation, and even surveillance of the drugs you're taking.
- Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorist Prevention Act of 2007 criminalizes American citizens who exercise their Constitutional right of dissent.
