| |
|
Assault on the Fourth Amendment
The right of the people to be secure in their persons,
houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall
not be violated; and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be
searched and the persons or things to be seized. - The Bill of Rights
Seizures of property due to a plethora of laws and regulations are
commonplace today. Now if the government wants it, charges can be trumped and
the property taken, often without trial.
Beware of what you eat On December 1, 2008 the Ohio
Department of Agriculture (ODA) and the Lorain County Health Department
violated the constitutional rights of John and Jacqueline Stowers of LaGrange,
Ohio. The Stowers operate an organic food cooperative called Manna Storehouse.
ODA and Lorain County Health Department agents forcefully raided their home and
unlawfully seized the family's personal food supply, cell phones and personal
computers. The Stowers, parents of eight children (including one son serving in
Iraq), have been accused of violating retail food establishment licensure laws.
"The use of these police state tactics on a peaceful family is simply
unacceptable," Buckeye Institute President David Hansen said. "Officers rushed
into the Stowers' home with guns drawn and held the family - including ten
young children - captive for six hours."
The
Buckeye Institute
argues the right to buy food directly from local farmers; distribute
locally-grown food to neighbors; and pool resources to purchase food in bulk
are rights that do not require a license. In addition, the right of peaceful
citizens to be free from paramilitary police raids, searches and seizures is
guaranteed under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and
Section 14, Article 1 of the Ohio Constitution.
"If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the
guise of fighting a foreign enemy." - James Madison
The War on Terror President Bush expanded the power of
the executive branch in the ever-increasing surveillance of American citizens.
Attorney General Michael Mukasey is set to begin implementing new FBI
guidelines that could begin national security and criminal investigations of
racial and ethnic groups without any evidence of wrongdoing. Lara Jakes Jordan
of The Associated Press pointed out: "The new policy, law enforcement officials
said, would let agents open preliminary terrorism investigations after mining
public records and intelligence (including tips from informants) to build a
profile of traits that, taken together, were deemed suspicious." There would be
no evidence of criminal activity.
Mukasey also has "proposed a new
domestic-spying measure that would make it easier for state and local police to
collect intelligence about Americans, share the sensitive data with federal
agencies and retain it for at least 10 years" (The Washington Post, Aug. 16).
State and local police agencies would not be hampered by Fourth Amendment's
requirements that they must search and seize traces of our activities and
beliefs only upon "probable cause" that we are, or have been or plan to be,
involved in criminal actions. They would need only a suspicion that we somehow
are involved in terrorism or are providing "material support" to terrorism.
"Material support" can mean sending a check to a charitable organization that,
unknown to the giver, provides funds to a group later listed by the government
as a terrorist group.
"Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives
people harder than a fear of sudden death." - Adolf Hitler
The War on Drugs Democratic politicians like the
War on Drugs just as it is -- because they love
the power it gives the federal government. Republican politicians want to
accelerate the War on Drugs -- by taking away more of your Constitutional
liberties, by taking away more of your privacy, by turning America into more of
a police state.
In yet another violation of the Fourth Amendment, The Family
Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act was passed by Congress giving
sweeping new powers over tobacco to the FDA, and will require everyone engaged
in manufacturing, preparing, compounding, or processing tobacco to register
with the FDA and be subjected to FDA inspections. The FDA will now have the
power of pre-market reviews of all new tobacco products, and will impose new
user fees, meaning taxes, on manufacturers and importers of tobacco products.
Curiously, this bill with more layers of bureaucracy and interference was
supported by tobacco corporate giant, Phillip Morris. Other tobacco companies
have taken to calling the bill the Marlboro Monopoly Act of 2009.
One has to wonder how many smaller farmers will be forced out of business
because of this bill.
Bill Clinton's
War on Drugs shredded much of what remained of the Bill of
Rights. The biggest losers in the war were mothers, fathers, small-time
dealers, medical-marijuana users and even children -- not the "drug kingpins".
Financially, police agencies involved in the forfeiture of property
were winners. Following the passage of the 1984 Omnibus Crime Bill, police
agencies were allowed to sell the assets they seized and keep the money.
Tens of thousands of people had their property seized for the most trivial
drug-law infractions. On the highways, police use "drug courier profiles" to
stop and search motorists and confiscate their vehicles if any drugs are found.
At airports, travelers' cash is seized when it tests positive for traces of
cocaine.
- In Denver, Colorado, 13 SWAT team members stormed the upstairs
apartment of Ismael Mena looking for drugs. After breaking open the front door,
the SWAT team found the door to Mena's room latched, and kicked it in. Police
say they found him armed with a .22 revolver, standing on his bed. Officers
claim they screamed "Police!" and "Drop the gun!" repeatedly. Mena started to
put the gun down, asking, "Policia?" But police say when they then moved to
disarm him, he again raised the gun. Officers opened fire. Mena, a father of
nine, was hit by eight bullets and killed instantly. No drugs were found. The
next day, SWAT team officers learned they had raided the wrong residence-they
should have gone next door.
- In Pennsylvania, a 21-year-old man with no prior offenses, was
shot to death in his house by a squad of masked police dressed in ninja-style
uniforms. They didn't even knock before tossing a smoke grenade through a
window, setting fire to the house. The unarmed John Hirko, suspected of dealing
small amounts of marijuana and cocaine, was found face down on his stairway,
shot in the back while fleeing the fire.
Imagine what will happen when "hate speech" laws are linked up
with forfeiture statutes. People will be afraid to speak for fear of having
their property seized.
Protect
your constitutional rights during police encounters
© Copyright 2000-2009 Jeremiah Project
|